When pursuing a 'shift' or 'reformation' in the church and society, there are various levels at which we need a renewal of thinking. One level is that of our overall worldview, the relationship between God and men, His foundational purposes with this world. My philosopher friend Evert-Jan Ouweneel, who's part of the Shift and GIDS networks (check out this interesting radio interview with him in Dutch), has the gift of painting a large, holistic perspective of God's restoration plan. At university he's walking his students through world history in just ten hours, which is quite admirable. We talked about how to communicate some of his quite abstract theological-philosophical-reformational megaperspectives to a wider non-academic audience.
One of the concepts we covered is that of salvation, heaven and hell. The Greek and Roman influence in the church turned this into a guilt and judgement issue where based on a revelation of our sinful state we make a one-time decision with eternal consequences. In this view the earth is a temporal dwelling place that will perish, so why invest here and now, except to save souls for eternity? Heaven is a place where we hang out with Jesus and sing songs eternally, while hell is a real place where people who don't 'choose for Jesus' suffer eternally. Is this simplistic and legalistic perspective really consisent with God's character and overall redemption plan? asks Evert-Jan. He wrote an article in Dutch with 40 reasons/arguments for a different view on redemption. Those who follow Christ become here and now part of his Nehemiah-type 'restoration interim government', which is not the same as 'being a Christian' or 'going to church'. He also has good arguments why our Catholic or Evangelical concept of heaven and hell doesn't make sense. We hope to get some of his material translated into English, as I believe it's quite timely input.