We spent a day at the staff conference of Christian Associates at De Bron. It was interesting to hear how this church planting network operates, meet team members from different European cities, and play a good soccer match. It was also a timely opportunity to catch up with Alan and Debra Hirsch from Australia (who talked me in on the spiritual landscape Down Under, as I'm planning to go there in September), Rogier Bos (who posted some reflections on church as a dangerous place), Stefan and Andrea Lingott and Byron and Lisa Borden (who are leaving the Lisboa Matrix for a new assignment in Tanzania, see Barbara's blog post).
Several people working with CAI suggested that this network might fit with us, because it's innovative, mission-minded, focused on Europe, and encouraging entrepreneurship. I recognize this as a great trait of CAI, which makes them stand out from most other denominations and church networks. However, I also see three areas in which we don't match, because I want to model a different way forward:
1. CAI has a strong American flavour (looking at the attendance at De Bron, at least 70 percent of their staff are Americans), while I believe God called us to help raise up indigenous ministry in Europe. It's hard to do that when the team context is primarily American.
2. While CAI is very much an open network, most church plants are Crossroads-style, which in my view is a trendy improvement of church-as-we-know it, and not reformational. There are also church plants in CAI that are more of an organic nature, but one of the leaders confirmed my impression that these in a way have to 'prove' their existence. I believe that in pioneering ministry it's crucial that your home base fully understands and provides back-up for what you do.
3. Perhaps the main reason not to join an existing network, and especially a network that has been around for a number of years and developed it's own traditions and ministry practices, is that God called us to lay new foundations, and not build on other people's foundations. This may sound a bit independent, but I believe it's a matter of calling. When you're called to pioneer a new paradigm (new wine in new wineskins), it's better to start from scratch then to renew something that's already there.
What do you think? Open for reflections.